Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) vs ConocoPhillips (COP)
The same free fields, in the same order, for both companies, so a figure on one line can be read straight across.
This page states measurements and nothing else. It does not rank the two companies, name one of them, or draw a conclusion from the figures.
Data as of Oct 27, 2026, for both companies.
The figures, field by field
A dash means the snapshot carries no figure for that company on that line. A line is dropped only when neither company has it, so a dash beside a figure is a fact about coverage, not about either company.
| BTU | COP | |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Thermal Coal | Oil & Gas E&P |
| Size band | MID | LARGE |
| Listing | NYSE | NYSE |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Theme | coal-mining | oil-and-gas-exploration |
| Price and returns | ||
| Last close | $22.36 | $151.37 |
| Return · 1 week | −5.93% | +4.22% |
| Return · 1 month | −11.09% | +20.10% |
| Return · 3 months | −3.79% | +32.66% |
| Return · year to date | −26.72% | +58.93% |
| Return · 1 year | −20.51% | +74.89% |
| Distance from the 52-week highThe last close measured against the highest close of the past 52 weeks. | −45.65% | −0.92% |
| 52-week high | $41.14 | $152.77 |
| 52-week low | $20.06 | $85.57 |
| Size and turnover | ||
| Market value · USDConverted to US dollars, so two companies listed in different currencies sit under one heading. | $2.73B | $181.85B |
| Turnover · median day, USDThe median value traded in a session over the past 50 sessions. | $44.88M | $918.35M |
| Employees | 5,400 | 9,600 |
| Valuation | ||
| Price to earnings · trailing | n/a (negative earnings) | 19.41× |
| Price to earnings · forward | 8.81× | 13.93× |
| Price to sales | 0.76× | 2.73× |
| Price to book | 0.94× | 2.69× |
| Enterprise value to EBITDA | 10.74× | 7.16× |
| Enterprise value to revenue | 0.74× | 2.97× |
| PEG ratio | — | 1.14 |
| Earnings per share · trailing | -1.49 | 7.55 |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 10.40% | 27.68% |
| Operating margin | −9.47% | 31.51% |
| Profit margin | −4.56% | 14.35% |
| Return on equity | −4.77% | 14.18% |
| Return on assets | −1.54% | 7.53% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth | +12.70% | +35.50% |
| Earnings growth | — | +107.00% |
| Balance sheet and payout | ||
| Debt / equity (%) | 12.88 | 35.64 |
| Current ratio | 2.01 | 1.54 |
| Dividend yield | 1.20% | 2.29% |
| Payout ratio | 28.57% | 43.71% |
| Trend and volatility | ||
| RSI · 14 | 33.42 | 77.28 |
| ADX · 14 | 26.83 | 32.82 |
| 50-day average | $26.10 | $134.56 |
| 200-day average | $28.33 | $120.25 |
| Average true range · share of priceAverage true range over 14 sessions, stated as a share of the last close, so it can be read across two share prices. | 4.53% | 2.42% |
The full BTU analysis
Everything this table leaves out for Peabody Energy Corporation: the plain-language summary and key points, the accumulation read, signal history, full fundamentals, market context, and the case each side of the BTU argument makes.
$9.90 per stock, one time, 30 days of access.
Open the full BTU analysisThe full COP analysis
Everything this table leaves out for ConocoPhillips: the plain-language summary and key points, the accumulation read, signal history, full fundamentals, market context, and the case each side of the COP argument makes.
$9.90 per stock, one time, 30 days of access.
Open the full COP analysis